I agree. As someone who has played previous versions of this game, they made many changes to the balance, but not the market. In earlier forms of aoc, the market abuse was generally not as strong, ie fuedal age buildings, towers, and walls were stronger and maps were different too. In my view it...
Re: Do you think general skill of people has improved recent
A top player is a top player regardless. I know players who have come back after years of inactivity and return to there old rates within some time. Yes strats improve I agree, but the quality of the player who has years experience...
Daut can never be no1 ever? Daut was the number 1 player for the longest time of aoc history. He has fell before to other players when taking time off, but eventually came back and set the game another level countless times. I do agree however daut hasnt done this in recent history, but that...
but the fact is, its 10 years later. and that's 10 more years experience, in my opinion 10 years is a lot of experience and that will override "natural ability"
Regardless, I can tell they don't know anything about AOC. I know 1750s looking better than this. Even if they were here today and see what has become of AOC and attempted to adapt, there is still much more to learn than just a build order and what units to make and this takes time more than...
Noob game. Them guys wouldn't make it out of feudal age vs a 1900. And micro was not impressive. And judging by there tactics and game decisions, they look 1750. A few months to be a top player? They have too much to learn 11.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.