The thread on Group D got me thinking about the other groups.
As of 3/7
Group A:
IF Hera doesn't return and his points are voided...
Viper has clinched 1st seed.
Stark has clinched 2nd seed.
IF Hera returns everything changes...
If Whoop beats Yellow, he advances.
If BacT beats Lojza, he advances as 2nd, Whoop 1st.
Player that need help to advance:
Chris: He needs either Whoop or BacT to lose their final series and he will advance.
DauT: He needs Whoop AND BacT to lose their final series and he will advance as...
How do you know they "ignored" the settings? Maybe they just misunderstood them. They were one of the first (if not THE first) series to play and we are dealing with a language/culture difference here. To assume they just ignored the settings is a little insulting.
Replying the games allows...
At this point I don't know if I will be watching anymore Invitational games.
Not because I dislike Taff or am a supporter of Tim, but because the integrity of this tournament is gone (the exact thing Taff was trying to avoid). I cannot take a tournament seriously when the admin staff is...
IMO, the admin are more to blame then Tim (and others). The group round could be designed better to "motivate" players to keep their opponents from winning. The way the current rules are set up, there is no difference between winning a series 3-0 and 3-2. Certainty everyone would prefer a series...
So you found no evidence of of cheating, but you didn't like how the games were played so you voided the points?
What about Viper's matches against Zuppi and Stark? You think him picking Teutons and Chinese demonstrated the "integrity expected" of the tournament players?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.