AztecsYou get to keep only 12 and your goal is to make the game as fun as possible, what do you save?
I would go with:
Huns
Malians
Chinese
Mayans
Turks
Celts
Lithuanians
Koreans
Cumans
Japanese
Byzantines
Vietnamese
Curious, since cumans would be on my top 3 list of civs I think should be removed from the gameYou get to keep only 12 and your goal is to make the game as fun as possible, what do you save?
I would go with:
Cumans
The only civ I hate with a passion is Britons, not fun to play as, extremely frustrating to play against.
They are unique but not overpowered (at least in 1v1)Curious, since cumans would be on my top 3 list of civs I think should be removed from the game
what do you enjoy about them?
I also hate them and for me it's the only makes 1 unit and it has 100000 range for no reason thing. So every game against them is the same.How do you find Britons not fun to play? I am not critiquing you, genuinely curious because they are one of most played civs.
Because they feel extremely one dimension, you know you have one strat, and that strat is insanely good. So you try to make the most out of it and win the game through it. I'm usually a player who likes to play very weird all in strats (especially on arena), but britons do not allow for any mindgames, you know what you will do, your opponent knows what you will do, nothing more to it.How do you find Britons not fun to play? I am not critiquing you, genuinely curious because they are one of most played civs.
See what I said in response to Paint. This makes sense to me. I think same criticism can be made of any xbow spam civ but they are particularly bad because of how powerful the range bonus is.Because they feel extremely one dimension, you know you have one strat, and that strat is insanely good. So you try to make the most out of it and win the game through it. I'm usually a player who likes to play very weird all in strats (especially on arena), but britons do not allow for any mindgames, you know what you will do, your opponent knows what you will do, nothing more to it.
Celts (hoang style)
Sicilians (donjon tower rush)
Koreans (Tower rush)
Saracens (13 min FC monk rush archers)
Incas (vil fight for days)
Aztecs (Eagle spam forward siege workshop)
Mongols (14 min fc into hoang)
Frank’s (Frank pocket paladin baby)
Huns (fast games on Arabia, so many army’s)
Slavs (cheap siege, fast farms)
Spanish (supremacy, conq donk combo)
Goths (drush, Insta loom into lame)
the sloppier and messier games the better 11
Also MAKE CELTS GREAT AGAIN!! I want the op fast militia back, it was the best thing in the game
I agree that you could redestitute some of the bonuses by cutting only 10-12 civilizations but why stop there 11I would look at it a different way. You could easily cut at least 10-12 civs, pick and choose some of the cut civs' interesting bonuses and make the remaining 25-27 civs more interesting. The game would probably be better for it.
Would cut Tatars, Cumans, Portugese, Burmese, Slavs, Magyars, Koreans, Goths, Incas and Lithuanians + the 2 civs released today.