seems like the Bo3 isn't fair or good for choose who will go ahead.
suck more ass plzYou guys are a bunch of whining little bitches - to quote Burn Notice.
The admin decision is correct, and the reasoning is sound. Let me tell you why:
If you bet black on a roulette wheel, and it turns up red, would you say that it would have been equally fair to play on a roulette wheel with only red spots? Of course not.
LR and the wrong version of CoT_Map_Pack are not even REMOTELY comparable.
Learn to follow the damn rules, it isn't that hard. An no, there should not be any rematch, this is a tournament not a freak show. He got a second chance, and he blew it.
And yeah, just saw that Carlos Ferdinand explained it perfectly fine.
And why am I even posting? Because I was reading about the Marillion-case, and people claiming that admins had made two mistakes already. After reading this, I can conclude they've done zero mistakes.
You guys are a bunch of whining little bitches - to quote Burn Notice.
The admin decision is correct, and the reasoning is sound. Let me tell you why:
If you bet black on a roulette wheel, and it turns up red, would you say that it would have been equally fair to play on a roulette wheel with only red spots? Of course not.
LR and the wrong version of CoT_Map_Pack are not even REMOTELY comparable.
Learn to follow the damn rules, it isn't that hard. An no, there should not be any rematch, this is a tournament not a freak show. He got a second chance, and he blew it.
And yeah, just saw that Carlos Ferdinand explained it perfectly fine.
And why am I even posting? Because I was reading about the Marillion-case, and people claiming that admins had made two mistakes already. After reading this, I can conclude they've done zero mistakes.
This guy is redefining the awful poster game forever. Breaking barriers, really.
I will explain this for the last time to you. Read this properly if you want to understand what is the logic.what did he get wrong?
so if the map was randomed into double migra, it would be meatballs in the proper version. However this scenario didnt arise).
And the result? The maps would have been same for sure if the choice was version one or two. BUT NOT IF LR WAS CHOSEN, with a very high amount of probability. Need to stop thinking with tunnel vision here.
you got this wrong tho. if scenarios arising or not would mean anything, light random would be perfectly fine because wrong map scenarios didnt "arise" with it either. **** logic?
CoT1, and CoT2 are basically the same map set with the only change being that one map was replaced, and 2 other maps were changed. Both have the same map selection criteria. We can safely say no fault has occurred for the result to be accepted as long as the maps drawn were not these 3 maps that were changed/replaced. LR has a completely different set of maps, with different probabilities of map selection. Suppose I made a new map pack myself which has 2 maps (YEA EXAGGERATING for you to get this logic)- arabia and Rooster. Lets say both have 50-50 chances of being drawn and I mistakenly used this map pack for games, and we got rooster. Do you see how this scenario that arose (Rooster is a CoT map as well) is not acceptable despite a valid CoT map being drawn?