Having skull who is our best consistent player for 10+ years seeding rate of 1920 while he should be 2100+ according to rating parameters is just disappointing. He got at least 3 nicknames of 2000+ actual 1v1 and around 2250 top rating on them.
I Promised myself i wouldn't be involved in any kind of polemic in this tourney... so great to do it before the qualy stages -.-How can you know? St4rk message on this topic...
That's very generous of you <3 Let's see if admins allow it and if Ares A wants to use itI would be happy to volunteer my team to switch seed with Ares A. Kind of sick that we are about to have what is essentially a two week, poorly seeded qualification that will determine the participants of 7 more events over the course of a year, all of which after the first are essentially invitationals. And the true 8th and 9th best teams don't even have to fight each other to get there...
How can you know? St4rk message on this topic at
Saturday at 2:27 PM GMT and admins corrected right away, look at he first page of this topic. CZ team message here around 20 GMT and they are still waiting. All of that was posted AFTER sign up has been closed. Or can you post me how much time have teams for reclamation?
And asked ACCM, he said he have informed that before sign up closed
Yeah, It’s not error, happened to me in MoA4, I signed up with rating 2k+ that had 2k1 highest rated reach on it, while I had on another one 2k2 rate with highest rating reach 2k4.I won't call these errors.
Indeed, the only team that cried is VNS A, even though you informed the admin before the deadline of the sign up, but for some reason (we don't care), after the bracket it out, bact's rating is calculated in the "default" method. IMO, bracket should NOT be changed even though there is some "mistake". Otherwise, how do you distinguish different types of "mistake"? The rule clearly does not say that. Well, after your team's cry and get the "correct" result, the other teams want the same and then you cried again. 11111111111Next time give admins an easier time and make ur team mates use only one account. They already have a hard time setting everything up and now u want them to balance one player rating based on smurf accounts? Lul
Thats just plain wrong.Indeed, the only team that cried is VNS A, even though you informed the admin before the deadline of the sign up, but for some reason (we don't care), after the bracket it out, bact's rating is calculated in the "default" method. IMO, bracket should NOT be changed even though there is some "mistake". Otherwise, how do you distinguish different types of "mistake"? The rule clearly does not say that. Well, after your team's cry and get the "correct" result, the other teams want the same and then you cried again. 11111111111
VNS A made a great move, they know they bring a KING of cry!!! 11111111
Lovecheng's main account ( the yinghua one in SY) and Straydog's main account ( the one actually called straydog_) both have higher ratings as well if you calculate those together.
That Skull account everyone talks about only has a 1v1 rating (no TG rating at all) so his 19xx 1v1 19xx TG rated account gives him a higher rating obviously. Unless you can suddenly take ratings from multiple accounts ? that would be a bit ridiculous though.
Meanwhile Patin from that argentinian team, has a average rating of 1855.75 which is totally ridiculous too, he has so many accounts that are higher than the one used for the signups, the SinSide one in gaucho for example. 2052 1v1 and 1861 TG rating right now (not counting peaks) as you can see just his TG rating alone is higher than his average with the other account.
This is quite funny how many rating errors there are.
11, IMO, only one account should be taken into consideration. Otherwise, you could have 1v1 account, tg account, point trading is too easy. The rule is not clearly at all, that's why not every team members signed up their main account. Back signed up with 8euRo account, then that's the one should be used for calculating, it does not matter whether you mentioned in the sign up form or not. If VNSAdo not cry for the bracket, the other teams won't either.I won't call these errors.
Wrong. Bact's rate was adjusted after it was pointed out in the comments below after the signup deadline. When we saw that we just reported the same issue which happened to our team. The thing is Ovenka probably signed us up only with the most known accounts and forget the highest rated accounts. What I don't understand is this double standard. If VNA ratings can be adjusted in few hours why cannot ours after 2 days. I mean come on what's the big deal. It takes 10 minutes to change that. I think it is a common habbit in aoe community to sign up for tournaments with the accounts which are known in community even though you have others which are higher rated. The alternate accounts should be used for seedings though.Thats just plain wrong.
VNA provided the right account of BacT before the signups closed. That is not the case for CZ and Ares (who haven't said anything so far).
Wrong. It seems they have informed it before sign up close but admin use wrong account, in this case Admin re-do it is right.Wrong.
Not "wrong" (at least according to some statements here). Of course, we can only speculate because we don't know the private conversation but it was claimed that VNA had messaged robo before the deadline and apparently that was confirmed by him.Wrong. Bact's rate was adjusted after it was pointed out in the comments below after the signup deadline. When we saw that we just reported the same issue which happened to our team. The thing is Ovenka probably signed us up only with the most known accounts and forget the highest rated accounts. What I don't understand is this double standard. If VNA ratings can be adjusted in few hours why cannot ours after 2 days. I mean come on what's the big deal. It takes 10 minutes to change that. I think it is a common habbit in aoe community to sign up for tournaments with the accounts which are known in community even though you have others which are higher rated. The alternate accounts should be used for seedings though.
Why he provided the right account, he knows that's going to affect his rating, right? Anyway, the bracket is done and it won't be changed again (the only change called by VNS A). The admin won't even give a formal response because they know they cannot give perfect answer. And you, try your best to disrespect the other teams that want "fair" result.Thats just plain wrong.
VNA provided the right account of BacT before the signups closed. That is not the case for CZ and Ares (who haven't said anything so far).
Wrong. Bact's rate was adjusted after it was pointed out in the comments below after the signup deadline. When we saw that we just reported the same issue which happened to our team. The thing is Ovenka probably signed us up only with the most known accounts and forget the highest rated accounts. What I don't understand is this double standard. If VNA ratings can be adjusted in few hours why cannot ours after 2 days. I mean come on what's the big deal. It takes 10 minutes to change that. I think it is a common habbit in aoe community to sign up for tournaments with the accounts which are known in community even though you have others which are higher rated. The alternate accounts should be used for seedings though.
The real crier comes now, you call it too earlyWell it's ez to cry after seeding u are not happy with and using excuses like yeah but i got this account that got better rate. You know they take rate in consideration so u should have signed up with highest account which is normal. Now can we please stop these cry posts....
Indeed, the only team that cried is VNS A, even though you informed the admin before the deadline of the sign up, but for some reason (we don't care), after the bracket it out, bact's rating is calculated in the "default" method. IMO, bracket should NOT be changed even though there is some "mistake". Otherwise, how do you distinguish different types of "mistake"? The rule clearly does not say that. Well, after your team's cry and get the "correct" result, the other teams want the same and then you cried again. 11111111111
VNS A made a great move, they know they bring a KING of cry!!! 11111111
blablacryblablacry : dracont, is that you ? (sorry)Wrong. Bact's rate was adjusted after it was pointed out in the comments below after the signup deadline. When we saw that we just reported the same issue which happened to our team. The thing is Ovenka probably signed us up only with the most known accounts and forget the highest rated accounts. What I don't understand is this double standard. If VNA ratings can be adjusted in few hours why cannot ours after 2 days. I mean come on what's the big deal. It takes 10 minutes to change that. I think it is a common habbit in aoe community to sign up for tournaments with the accounts which are known in community even though you have others which are higher rated. The alternate accounts should be used for seedings though.