I definitely don't think Jordan ever goes for this side base CA strategy with no siege behind it while completely ignoring the middle.
The walling behind for chop and walling vil building TC, stone walling a side(1st game) are all Jordan traits. But they could be some other players' trait too, I guess.I definitely don't think Jordan ever goes for this side base CA strategy with no siege behind it while completely ignoring the middle.
The walling behind for chop and walling vil building TC, stone walling a side(1st game) are all Jordan traits. But they could be some other players' trait too, I guess.
That could be a fair assessment but I feel those concepts are a bit vague and harder to judge and can be quite subjective. When one is on the back foot, strategies and plans falter.But that's just execution - the core concept was risky, aggressive, unnecessary and not well thought through at all. That isn't Jordan to me.
I keep rotating for Sumanguru (like Jadwiga).What do you think about Sumanguru being Heartt or Sebastian?
I keep rotating for Sumanguru (like Jadwiga).
Had Hearttt instantly after game 3 of the first set, then moved to Barles, Sitaux, ... I keep rotating and this set won't help as Hera just claps 4-0.
I don't see many players this can clearly be and not many players this can't be at all. Especially as draft set 1 and set 2 went in completely different directions.
I can't even rule out Barles after thinking about it, despite Islands. There's a fringe possibility that Ganji and Barles communicated (like Barles being Sumanguru and asking for practice and Ganji saying he's out and discussing a bit) even if on paper forbidden, and Ganji saying he lost to Hera-Vasco, which could explain the switch in draft and sudden ban of all aggro maps from Sumanguru.
This is a bit of a conspiracy theory, but it's interesting that Sumanguru set 1 was confident to pick land maps, and here just banned all of them as if he knew he'd face Hera (not that it's helping him)
I can't even rule out Barles after thinking about it, despite Islands. There's a fringe possibility that Ganji and Barles communicated (like Barles being Sumanguru and asking for practice and Ganji saying he's out and discussing a bit) even if on paper forbidden, and Ganji saying he lost to Hera-Vasco, which could explain the switch in draft and sudden ban of all aggro maps from Sumanguru.
This is a bit of a conspiracy theory, but it's interesting that Sumanguru set 1 was confident to pick land maps, and here just banned all of them as if he knew he'd face Hera (not that it's helping him)
Why do you think Sumanguru is Jordan? Would Jordan ban Islands in round 1?Hera taking Jordan's spot in GL and then borderline disrespecting him with the sheep D:
Some people have very strong opinions about that. Still does not make any sense to me and to I think many people who know Jordan, especially having seen Robert Guiscard which was a near perfect match.Why do you think Sumanguru is Jordan? Would Jordan ban Islands in round 1?
I agree. Banning your most successful map in hidden cup in round 1 where you have absolutely zero idea who youre facing seems very unlikely to me, no matter who the player is.Some people have very strong opinions about that. Still does not make any sense to me and to I think many people who know Jordan, especially having seen Robert Guiscard which was a near perfect match.
But still Sumanguru does not perfectly match anyone. Could still be Sitaux, Hearttt, Sebastian, Barles, I guess. I'd really say Barles and the "I spoke with Ganji" theory is maybe the best one for me so far.
Tell me that. I put all my credibility (that doesn't exist) as Jorden expert in my first post in this thread.Oh we're definitely past the point of convincing each other.
But I'll question several years of my life if I'm that wrong on Jordan