I've been told Man at Arms is a bad idea by top players in Klavskis stream chat.
Can i ask why? If anything their man at arms into archers should be really strong is it not? I can't see any reason to do a scouts opening with them and you get a 2-3 vill lead.
It was the game Klavskis almost got 2k in a Malay war vs b1ack and he said you can't do anything with this civ and that man at arms is bad and chat (the legit ones 1800+ Voobly) said scouts into archer is better with them.
If anyone could shed some light on how you should open with them on standard Arabia, id really appreciate it coz apparently I've been doing it wrong.
Thanks.
Can i ask why? If anything their man at arms into archers should be really strong is it not? I can't see any reason to do a scouts opening with them and you get a 2-3 vill lead.
It was the game Klavskis almost got 2k in a Malay war vs b1ack and he said you can't do anything with this civ and that man at arms is bad and chat (the legit ones 1800+ Voobly) said scouts into archer is better with them.
If anyone could shed some light on how you should open with them on standard Arabia, id really appreciate it coz apparently I've been doing it wrong.
Thanks.