Hello, fellow AoEZone plebs.
I would like to introduce to you a situation that recently occurred between the great nation player representatives of the United Kingdom A, and Austria A in the midst of NC23.
A time was agreed upon between the two sides for a match on 8 April.
The games were split 2-2. UK A was ready to proceed with game 5 as the two sides had agreed to at that time, but Austria A could not/would not continue. UK A had set aside time to ensure all games were played by an agreed upon time, but Austria A was not able to fulfill their commitment.
The fifth game was postponed for five days -- at which time --Lierrey -- who was not available for the previous four games and would not have been available if the fifth game was continued was allowed to enter for Austria A.
As you can imagine, when that player is perennial top 3 player Lierrey that might cause some sore feelings. Especially as Austria A went on to win game 5.
What are your thoughts on the decision(s)?
I would like to introduce to you a situation that recently occurred between the great nation player representatives of the United Kingdom A, and Austria A in the midst of NC23.
A time was agreed upon between the two sides for a match on 8 April.
The games were split 2-2. UK A was ready to proceed with game 5 as the two sides had agreed to at that time, but Austria A could not/would not continue. UK A had set aside time to ensure all games were played by an agreed upon time, but Austria A was not able to fulfill their commitment.
The fifth game was postponed for five days -- at which time --Lierrey -- who was not available for the previous four games and would not have been available if the fifth game was continued was allowed to enter for Austria A.
As you can imagine, when that player is perennial top 3 player Lierrey that might cause some sore feelings. Especially as Austria A went on to win game 5.
What are your thoughts on the decision(s)?